Adult Use Cannabis Legalization Bills Introduced

Adult Use Cannabis Legalization Bills Introduced

Illinois lawmakers are currently working to advance legislation that would allow adults in Illinois to legally grow, possess and consume cannabis.  The twin bills, Senate Bill 316 and House Bill 2353, would allow adults 21 and over to grow up to five plants and purchase up to one ounce.  It would tax cannabis at $50 per ounce at the wholesale level and a 6.25% sales tax with a potential for higher local excise taxes.  These bills are projected to bring in between $350 and $700 Million dollars in tax revenue per year.

Illinois NORML supports these bills and are adamant about keeping home cultivation in any amendments to these bills.  The sponsors are holding hearings across the state to gather input from the public.  Please contact your State Representative and State Senator and urge them to “Vote Yes on Senate Bill 316 and House Bill 2353.”  217-782-2000 will connect you to the Capitol switchboard and the operator can connect you directly to your elected officials office.  Illinois NORML will also be holding more Lobby Days in 2018 to rally support behind these bills.

6 Comments
  • Patricia Schneider
    Posted at 06:14h, 22 December Reply

    Pharmacuetical drugs, cause so much devestation to people in need of pain medication, and sonmany so easily addicted. Cannabis is proven to alleviate pain, with no fear of addiction, and helps wean people with opioid addiction. It is a no brainer to legalize a organic plant, the pros outweigh the cons, and the procceds of sales, would help alleviate the the deficet of Illinois.

  • Catholic first church
    Posted at 00:30h, 12 March Reply

    I am not a scientist or a religious authority, consequently my query “Why Can’t The Theories of Evolution And Creationism Co-Exist?” could appear
    unintelligent, nonetheless it seems to me tthat the theories of evolution and creationism can be merged.
    What they truly do is to continue evidencing intelligent design as even though
    they have not been in a position to style and style life, what
    ever final results they do get (such a non-chiral amino acids) arre the oujtcomes of experiments that have been designed by nicely-trained
    intelligent scientists utilizing gear developed by nicely-educated intelligent engineers, as they set problems
    up with a preferred objective in thoughts.
    With that stated,there is no way to extricate our human history from a single point rule, religion, farming,
    science, everthing produced INTO got rotten later merely simply because
    of man’s tendency to think, if you reject every single issue about religion you can by no means
    ever truly realize about your can never ever get pleasure from the beauty of church music, you can by no means ever comprehend thee operate
    of ccan by no signifies take pleasure in the tribbal
    dances of sort of atheizt can take no nourishment from life

  • Eric K. Johnson
    Posted at 19:01h, 10 January Reply

    In her much loved dinner prep Instagram livestreams, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has made it clear that she thinks marijuana prohibition is a “tool” used to oppress people of color in the United States. But other than the fact she’d legalize cannabis and advocate for the release of people who have been incarcerated for nonviolent drug offenses, she hasn’t released much info on her ideas around cannabis.

    Those looking for clues to any potential strategy got another one this week, when Ocasio-Cortez announced that Dan Riffle, health care and tax reform expert, would be joining her staff as senior counsel and policy advisor.

    That’s big news for those with an eye on weed issues because, in addition to holding past staff positions for other members of Congress, Riffle was once director of federal policy for the Marijuana Policy Project. He left the organization back in 2014; attributing his departure to the overwhelming influence of big business in the legalization movement and how it shapes policy in terms of how cannabis is accessed.

    Upon leaving MPP, Riffle told Vox in an interview: ”We used to talk three or four years ago about how we’re creating this industry, yet nobody in the industry gives to MPP. But now that they do give at least a little, it’s like, ‘Be careful what you asked for.’ Because we owe them now, and they get to drive the agenda.”

    At the time, Riffle identified some key reasons why this may be the case, including the trend of low-level cannabis advocates swapping time between activism and positions within the commercial industry. Riffle also pinpointed issues around funding experienced by marijuana advocates should their connections end with big weed businesses.

    “Who’s going to pay for a nonprofit, collective cooperative model?” Riffle asked. “It’s hard to find somebody who is willing to do that, so it’s left to the industry to fund legalization measures, and of course the industry is going to fund industry-centered policies.”

    “The industry’s goal is to make money,” Riffle told International Business Times in 2015. “But from a public health perspective, we might have other goals that are at odds with the industry’s goal of making money.”

  • Bob Dobbleena
    Posted at 18:34h, 15 February Reply

    #POT=GOOD #CULTURAL MARXISM = DUMB FUCKS

  • LINDSEY FROST
    Posted at 13:27h, 19 February Reply

    Steans/Cassidy in champaign town hall say they are considering removing home grows due to leo concerns! They have already said they think more licensed producers may not be needed and will limit them at the very least, current med producers happy with no competition. People will still have their lives ruined for growing a few plants at home. Dan HELP!!!

Post A Comment